vs
Show Comparison

Botswana

vs

Angola

Basic Country Information

  • Region: Sub-Saharan Africa
  • Income Group: Upper Middle

How does Botswana control corruption?

Forecasted trend:
Stationary
Integrity Transparency
Country’s Score 4.83/10 8.5/
World Rank 85/114 114/143
Regional Rank 6/31 22/31
Income group Rank 38/40 45/40
  • Region: Sub-Saharan Africa
  • Income Group: Lower Middle

How does Angola control corruption?

Forecasted trend:
Stationary
Integrity Transparency
Country’s Score 4.83/10 7.5/20
World Rank 86/114 105/143
Regional Rank 7/31 18/31
Income group Rank 35/39 43/39

Botswana's Corruption Forecast

Forecasted trend:
Stationary
Côte d'Ivoire has started from the very bottom due to a civil conflict and therefore only improved in trends like reduction of administrative burden, judicial independence, or e-citizens. Overall resistance to corruption remains very low, however, with poor transparency, use of the judiciary for political means and particularistic allocation of public resources.
See Botswana's profile on the Index of Public Integrity.

Angola's Corruption Forecast

Forecasted trend:
Stationary
Burundi has very poor human development and control of corruption. It has the lowest access to Internet on the continent, resulting in a population largely unable to defend itself from abuse and claim access to basic rights. Well below its peers on judicial independence, (despite significant progress in the past 12 years) and freedom of the press, and with no fiscal transparency, it shows no signs of a takeoff on good governance any time soon.
See Angola's profile on the Index of Public Integrity.
Components 2007/8 2020 Trendline
Budget Transparency 6.93 7.23 1
Administrative Burden 6.77 7.82 1
Judicial Independence 7.5 6.44 0
Press Freedom 7.76 7.96 -1
E-Citizenship 1.25 5.41 0
Online Services 2.96 3.47 -1
  positive change;   negative change;   change not statically significant.

For Budget Transparency, period considered is 2008-2019. For Judicial Independence, last value available is for 2019. For Press Freedom, period considered is 2007-2017. Due to insufficient data on Facebook users, E-citizenship was computed as the mean of the remaining two sub-indicators (fixed broadband subscriptions and Internet users). Missing values for 2020 in either of the sub-indicators were replaced with the latest available data point.

Components 2007/8 2020 Trendline
Budget Transparency 4.73 7.23 1
Administrative Burden 6.71 7.84 1
Judicial Independence 3.93 2.87 0
Press Freedom 6.36 7.01 -1
E-Citizenship 1.08 2.33 0
Online Services 4.94 5.24 -1
  positive change;   negative change;   change not statically significant.

For Budget Transparency, period considered is 2008-2019. For Judicial Independence, period considered is 2011-2019. For Press Freedom, period considered is 2007-2017. Due to insufficient data on Facebook users, E-citizenship was computed as the mean of the remaining two sub-indicators (fixed broadband subscriptions and Internet users). Missing values for 2020 in either of the sub-indicators were replaced with the latest available data point.

Index of Public Integrity

The IPI score is the mean of the six components scores, which result from the standardization and normalization of original source data to range between 1 and 10 using a min-max-transformation, with higher values representing better performance.

For Budget Transparency, last value available is for 2019. For Online Services, last value available is for 2020. For Judicial Independence, last value available is for 2019. For the E-citizenship sub-components, last values available are also for 2020, and missing values in any of the sub-indicators were replaced with the latest available data point.

 

IPI Score: 4.83 / 10
2015 2017 2019 2021
Components Component Score
(max=10)		 World
Rank		 Income Group
Rank		 Regional
Rank
Opportunities for Corruption
Administrative Burden 0 /114 /40 /31
Trade Openness 0 /114 /40 /31
Administrative Transparency 4.38 81/114 37/40 6/31
Online Services 3.43 100/114 39/40 18/31
Budget Transparency 1.64 98/114 39/40 19/31
Constraints on Corruption
Judicial Independence 6.55 31/114 7/40 4/31
Freedom of the Press 7.93 31/114 7/40 5/31
E-Citizenship 5.03 75/114 36/40 1/31

IPI Score: 4.83 / 10
Components Component Score
(max=10)		 World
Rank		 Income Group
Rank		 Regional
Rank
Opportunities for Corruption
Administrative Burden 0 /114 /39 /31
Trade Openness 0 /114 /39 /31
Administrative Transparency 5.5 70/114 25/39 3/31
Online Services 4.71 90/114 37/39 13/31
Budget Transparency 7 66/114 23/39 7/31
Constraints on Corruption
Judicial Independence 2.91 106/114 44/39 25/31
Freedom of the Press 6.57 70/114 22/39 14/31
E-Citizenship 2.26 96/114 43/39 11/31

Transparency in Botswana

T-Index Score: 8.5 / 20

Transparency in Angola

T-Index Score: 7.5 / 20
T-index
 
 
T-index
 
 

De Facto Transparency: 6 / 14

De Facto Components

De facto components refer to the online availability, accessibility, and coverage of public data in selected relevant domains. These were assessed as completely existing (1 point), existing with partial information or paid access (0.5 point), or not existing (0 points).
Past expenditures (last fiscal year) Partial
Current expenditures (budget tracker) No
Public Procurement Portal Partial
Land cadaster No
Register of commerce Yes
Auditor General's report No
Supreme Court's hearings schedule Yes
Supreme Court's rulings Partial
Financial disclosures for public officials No
Conflict of interest disclosures No
Official Development Assistance (ODA) Yes
Mining concessions Yes
Building permits in the capital city No
Official gazette Partial

De Facto Transparency: 4.5 / 14

De Facto Components

De facto components refer to the online availability, accessibility, and coverage of public data in selected relevant domains. These were assessed as completely existing (1 point), existing with partial information or paid access (0.5 point), or not existing (0 points).
Past expenditures (last fiscal year) Partial
Current expenditures (budget tracker) Partial
Public Procurement Portal Partial
Land cadaster No
Register of commerce Yes
Auditor General's report No
Supreme Court's hearings schedule No
Supreme Court's rulings Yes
Financial disclosures for public officials No
Conflict of interest disclosures No
Official Development Assistance (ODA) Partial
Mining concessions No
Building permits in the capital city No
Official gazette Partial

De Jure Transparency: 2.5 / 6

De Jure Components

De jure components refer to the existence of formal transparency commitments in relevant selected domains. These were assessed as existing (1 point) or not (0 points).
Freedom of Information Acts (FOIA) No
Open Government Partnership (OGP) No
United Nations Conventions Against Corruption (UNCAC) Yes
Financial Action Task Force Against Money Laundering (or equivalent) Yes
Plurinational transparency agreement (EITI, OECD, WTO GPA, or CPTPP) No
Beneficial Ownership Partial

De Jure Transparency: 3 / 6

De Jure Components

De jure components refer to the existence of formal transparency commitments in relevant selected domains. These were assessed as existing (1 point) or not (0 points).
Freedom of Information Acts (FOIA) Yes
Open Government Partnership (OGP) No
United Nations Conventions Against Corruption (UNCAC) Yes
Financial Action Task Force Against Money Laundering (or equivalent) Yes
Plurinational transparency agreement (EITI, OECD, WTO GPA, or CPTPP) No
Beneficial Ownership No
  • Share this:
  • |
  • |