CorruptionRisk.org
alpha
Public Integrity
Transparency
Corruption Risk Forecast
Countries
Compare Countries
Afghanistan
Albania
Algeria
Angola
Argentina
Armenia
Australia
Austria
Azerbaijan
Bahamas
Bahrain
Bangladesh
Belarus
Belgium
Benin
Bolivia
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Botswana
Brazil
Bulgaria
Burkina Faso
Burundi
Cambodia
Cameroon
Canada
Chad
Chile
China
Colombia
Republic of Congo
Costa Rica
Côte d'Ivoire
Croatia
Cuba
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Denmark
Dominican Republic
DR Congo
Ecuador
Egypt
El Salvador
Estonia
Ethiopia
Finland
France
Gabon
Georgia
Germany
Ghana
Greece
Guatemala
Haiti
Honduras
Hong Kong
Hungary
Iceland
India
Indonesia
Iran
Iraq
Ireland
Israel
Italy
Jamaica
Japan
Jordan
Kazakhstan
Kenya
Korea Rep
Kosovo
Kuwait
Kyrgyz Republic
Latvia
Lebanon
Lesotho
Liberia
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Madagascar
Malawi
Malaysia
Mali
Malta
Mexico
Moldova
Mongolia
Montenegro
Morocco
Mozambique
Myanmar
Namibia
Nepal
Netherlands
New Zealand
Nicaragua
Nigeria
North Macedonia
Norway
Pakistan
Panama
Paraguay
Peru
Philippines
Poland
Portugal
Qatar
Romania
Russian Federation
Rwanda
Saudi Arabia
Senegal
Serbia
Sierra Leone
Singapore
Slovak Republic
Slovenia
South Africa
Spain
Sri Lanka
Sweden
Switzerland
Syria
Taiwan
Tajikistan
Tanzania
Thailand
Timor-Leste
Trinidad and Tobago
Tunisia
Turkey
Uganda
Ukraine
United Arab Emirates
United Kingdom
United States
Uruguay
Uzbekistan
Venezuela
Vietnam
Yemen
Zambia
Zimbabwe
About
A new generation of
corruption indicators
About The Corruption
Risk Forecast
Methodology IPI
Methodology T-index
Methodology Forecast
Data Download
News
19/06/23
Transparency in the Time of War – a Survey for 143 countries
Welcome to a new generation of transparency indicators! Straightforward. Directly observable. Actionable. And, of course, transparent. ERCAS's 2023 updated survey of real transparency for 143 countries shows that judiciaries are quite transparent, public expenditures more and more so, but any information which can be used directly to call officials to account is still strictly controlled.
Source:
www.againstcorruption.eu
06/09/22
Five Lessons on International Rule of Law Support
A newly released analytical tool called the Corruption Risk Forecast (CRF) surveys 120 countries to gauge the causal determinants of public integrity and combines them with the latest political developments. Together with older indicators like the World Bank’s rule of law score, the Rule of Law Index, and the V-Dem Project, this data offers five lessons on international support for the rule of law.
Source:
carnegieeurope.eu
12/04/22
New Corruption Forecast Gives Powerful Tools to Corruption Fighters & Global Investors
Consolidating a vast array of granular public data, the CRF provides three dashboards or “panes of glass” into the state of corruption around the world. These include a corruption index (the Index for Public Integrity, or IPI), a new country-by-country indicator for transparency (the Transparency Index), and the forward-looking Corruption Risk Forecast.
Source:
acgc.cipe.org
12/04/22
New Corruption Index Adds Forecasting
A new free corruption analysis tool, the Corruption Risk Forecast (CRF), provides both greater detail and predictive metrics. Developed through a partnership between two non-profits, the European Centre for Anti-Corruption and State-Building (ERCAS) and the Center for International Private Enterprise (CIPE), the CRF offers several advantages over previous corruption indices.
Source:
fcpablog.com
01/04/22
Counting the Dead Transparently
The new transparency index (T-index) shows that the official pandemic fatality figure is deeply flawed in many countries, starting with Russia. Once a war starts, propaganda becomes a chief weapon, so it is impossible to know the number of casualties from only one source. But even before the Russian-Ukrainian war, in the fight against the COVID 19 pandemic the truth seems to have been among the first casualties.
Source:
againstcorruption.eu
19/12/21
Doing Business Gate: Let’s not throw the baby out with the bathwater
The Wilmer Hale auditors’ report – which found that the top management of the World Bank pressured the research team of Doing Business to change post factum the methodology and manipulate rankings to make big funders look better – is a severe blow to the credibility of these indicators. While we wait to see what the World Bank will do next, we also need to continue our work and preserve the trust of the many who use ERCAS’s actionable indicators.
Source:
againstcorruption.eu
By using our website, you agree to our
cookie policy
×